Proposal: Composable Moderation Working Group

Presently, we don’t have a coordinated venue for the people building and running 3rd party infrastructure to share methods, align on shared threats, or develop common standards. This working group would fill that gap.

  • Cross-protocol threat coordination: spam, CSAM detection, and inauthentic coordinated campaigns
  • Detection methodology sharing and best practices
  • Infrastructure gaps and trust limitations (e.g., lack of bidirectional communication between labelers and users (including infrastructure users) and absence of mechanisms to surface labeling rationale)
  • Governance models for collective decision-making across independent operators
  • Interoperability standards for moderation tooling and data exchange between these pieces of infrastructure
  • Emerging issues—e.g., private data is going to mean new threat surfaces for PDS Admins

@thisismissem.social has posted interest in co-chairing something, @baileytownsend.dev has also posted about the need for a shared space for coordination, and relay operators have started @firehose.club to, among other things, address spam across the network.

Between the spam wave we’ve had over the last few weeks and momentum coming out of ATmosphereConf, this seems like a good time to gauge interest and potentially get a routine call going.

8 Likes

would love to be a part of something like this, representing teal.town!

3 Likes

:person_raising_hand:

(stupid 20 character limit)

1 Like

very relevant to barazo.forum so :man_raising_hand:

1 Like

Happy to set up:

  • a group here, LMK who should be owner and then they can allow / invite members
  • private category with access controlled by the group

Discourse has a couple of different settings and I can assist with setup / feedback on how things work.

But also: no need to pick this tool if you don’t want! We could literally just leave a post here with instructions on how / where to join.

LMK what you’d like.

2 Likes

Happy to join. We use pretty similar tools to skywatch in terms of osprey.

3 Likes

Thank you! I think we should start with discourse and if the group so chooses, we can always move elsewhere. If no one here objects, could assign @thisismissem.social and myself as owners of the space (assuming we can have 2), until we work out some governance procedures.

2 Likes

Great. People need to head to @ComposableModerationWG and “request invite” or owners you and @thisismissem.social can add.

Category is WG Composable Moderation and is accessible to everyone in the group.

Let me know how else I can assist!

1 Like

We‘re actually trying to apply for funding to build this with Eurosky. So I’m in!

3 Likes

I’m interested as well, and would endorse scoiattolo and missem as leaders/chairs.

I can work with @scoiattolo.mountainherder.xyz and others to make this more legible - but just click on the group name / browse the groups page and click on request invite if you want to join.

This is partially also a test of how easy or hard Discourse closed groups onboarding is.

Thanks @bmann.ca. For everyone who has expressed interest, I’ll get a welcome post up in the space tonight along with some to-dos that need to get started. Like the Lexicon community, we’ll want a covenant and contributor guidelines.

1 Like