Proposal: Composable Moderation Working Group

Presently, we don’t have a coordinated venue for the people building and running 3rd party infrastructure to share methods, align on shared threats, or develop common standards. This working group would fill that gap.

  • Cross-protocol threat coordination: spam, CSAM detection, and inauthentic coordinated campaigns
  • Detection methodology sharing and best practices
  • Infrastructure gaps and trust limitations (e.g., lack of bidirectional communication between labelers and users (including infrastructure users) and absence of mechanisms to surface labeling rationale)
  • Governance models for collective decision-making across independent operators
  • Interoperability standards for moderation tooling and data exchange between these pieces of infrastructure
  • Emerging issues—e.g., private data is going to mean new threat surfaces for PDS Admins

@thisismissem.social has posted interest in co-chairing something, @baileytownsend.dev has also posted about the need for a shared space for coordination, and relay operators have started @firehose.club to, among other things, address spam across the network.

Between the spam wave we’ve had over the last few weeks and momentum coming out of ATmosphereConf, this seems like a good time to gauge interest and potentially get a routine call going.

10 Likes

would love to be a part of something like this, representing teal.town!

3 Likes

:person_raising_hand:

(stupid 20 character limit)

1 Like

very relevant to barazo.forum so :man_raising_hand:

1 Like

Happy to set up:

  • a group here, LMK who should be owner and then they can allow / invite members
  • private category with access controlled by the group

Discourse has a couple of different settings and I can assist with setup / feedback on how things work.

But also: no need to pick this tool if you don’t want! We could literally just leave a post here with instructions on how / where to join.

LMK what you’d like.

2 Likes

Happy to join. We use pretty similar tools to skywatch in terms of osprey.

3 Likes

Thank you! I think we should start with discourse and if the group so chooses, we can always move elsewhere. If no one here objects, could assign @thisismissem.social and myself as owners of the space (assuming we can have 2), until we work out some governance procedures.

2 Likes

Great. People need to head to @ComposableModerationWG and “request invite” or owners you and @thisismissem.social can add.

Category is WG Composable Moderation and is accessible to everyone in the group.

Let me know how else I can assist!

1 Like

We‘re actually trying to apply for funding to build this with Eurosky. So I’m in!

3 Likes

I’m interested as well, and would endorse scoiattolo and missem as leaders/chairs.

1 Like

I can work with @scoiattolo.mountainherder.xyz and others to make this more legible - but just click on the group name / browse the groups page and click on request invite if you want to join.

This is partially also a test of how easy or hard Discourse closed groups onboarding is.

1 Like

Thanks @bmann.ca. For everyone who has expressed interest, I’ll get a welcome post up in the space tonight along with some to-dos that need to get started. Like the Lexicon community, we’ll want a covenant and contributor guidelines.

2 Likes

would like to join this working group as well as im running infra and want to prevent and mitigate spam and other harmful and illegal content.

2 Likes

Hi I would recommend to include the link you shared on discord to also be included in your main post so that people can onboard more easily.

The link im talking about is this one: https://discourse.atprotocol.community/g/ComposableModerationWG

1 Like